Support Chiropractic Research!

Frank M. Painter

About Frank M. Painter

I was introduced to Chiro.Org in early 1996, where my friend Joe Garolis helped me learn HTML, the "mark-up language" for websites. We have been fortunate that journals like JMPT have given us permission to reproduce some early important articles in Full-Text format. Maintaining the Org website has been, and remains, my favorite hobby.

Comparative Effectiveness of Cervical vs Thoracic Spinal-thrust Manipulation for Care of Cervicogenic Headache: A Randomized Controlled Trial

By |December 26, 2024|Cervicogenic Headache, Chiropractic Care|

Comparative Effectiveness of Cervical vs Thoracic Spinal-thrust Manipulation for Care of Cervicogenic Headache: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The Chiro.Org Blog


SOURCE:   PLoS One 2024 (Mar 29); 19 (3): e0300737 ~ FULL TEXT

  OPEN ACCESS   

Gopal Nambi • Mshari Alghadier • Mudathir Mohamedahmed Eltayeb • Osama R Aldhafian. et al.

Department of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences,
College of Applied Medical Sciences,
Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University,
Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia.



Background:   There is ample evidence supporting the use of different manipulative therapy techniques for cervicogenic headache (CgH). However, no technique can be singled as the best available treatment for patients with CgH. Therefore, the objective of the study is to find and compare the clinical effects of cervical spine over thoracic spine manipulation and conventional physiotherapy in patients with CgH.

Design, setting, and participants:   It is a prospective, randomized controlled study conducted between July 2020 and January 2023 at the University hospital. N = 96 eligible patients with CgH were selected based on selection criteria and they were divided into cervical spine manipulation (CSM; n = 32), thoracic spine manipulation (TSM; n = 32) and conventional physiotherapy (CPT; n = 32) groups, and received the respective treatment for four weeks. Primary (CgH frequency) and secondary CgH pain intensity, CgH disability, neck pain frequency, neck pain intensity, neck pain threshold, cervical flexion rotation test (CFRT), neck disability index (NDI) and quality of life (QoL) scores were measured. The effects of treatment at various intervals were analyzed using a 3 × 4 linear mixed model analysis (LMM), with treatment group (cervical spine manipulation, thoracic spine manipulation, and conventional physiotherapy) and time intervals (baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 6 months), and the statistical significance level was set at P < 0.05.

Results:   The reports of the CSM, TSM and CPT groups were compared between the groups. Four weeks following treatment CSM group showed more significant changes in primary (CgH frequency) and secondary (CgH pain intensity, CgH disability, neck pain frequency, pain intensity, pain threshold, CFRT, NDI and QoL) than the TSM and CPT groups (p = 0.001). The same gradual improvement was seen in the CSM group when compared to TSM and CPT.

Conclusion:   The reports of the current randomized clinical study found that CSM resulted in significantly better improvements in pain parameters (intensity, frequency and threshold) functional disability and quality of life in patients with CgH than thoracic spine manipulation and conventional physiotherapy.

Trial registration:   Clinical trial registration: CTRI/2020/06/026092 trial was registered prospectively on 24/06/2020.


From the FULL TEXT Article:

Introduction

There are more articles like this @

CERVICOGENIC HEADACHE Section

(more…)

Clinician Experiences in Providing Reassurance for Patients with Low Back Pain in Primary Care: a Qualitative Study

By |December 24, 2024|Low Back Pain|

Clinician Experiences in Providing Reassurance for Patients with Low Back Pain in Primary Care: a Qualitative Study

The Chiro.Org Blog


SOURCE:   J Physiotherapy 2024 (Dec 12): [EPUB]

  OPEN ACCESS   

Anika Young • Simon D French • Adrian C Traeger< Julie Ayre • Mark Hancock • Hazel J Jenkins
Department of Chiropractic,
Faculty of Medicine, Health and Health Science,
Macquarie University,
Sydney, Australia.



Questions:   What reassurance is being delivered by physiotherapists and chiropractors to people with non-specific low back pain? How is it being delivered? What are the barriers and enablers to delivering reassurance to people with non-specific low back pain?

Design:   A qualitative study.

Participants:   Thirty-two musculoskeletal clinicians (16 physiotherapists and 16 chiropractors) who manage low back pain in primary care.

Method:   Semi-structured interviews were conducted about their experiences delivering reassurance. The interview schedule was developed using the Theoretical Domains Framework and analysed using framework thematic analysis.

Results:   Four themes were identified: giving reassurance is a core clinical skill for delivering high-quality care; it takes practice and experience to confidently deliver reassurance; despite feeling capable and motivated, clinicians identified situations that challenge the delivery of reassurance; and reassurance needs to be contextualised to the individual.

Conclusion:   Clinicians possess a strong understanding of reassurance but require clinical experience to confidently deliver it. This study provides insights into how reassurance is individualised in clinical practice, including suggestions for clinicians about how to implement reassurance effectively for people with low back pain.

Keywords:   Low back pain; Primary healthcare; Qualitative research; Reassurance.


From the FULL TEXT Article:

Introduction

Low back pain (LBP) is common and is associated with substantial disability. Worldwide, 619 million people experienced back pain in 2020, [1] and there are significant personal and societal costs related to LBP. [2, 3] In Australia, back pain continues to be the second leading cause of disability [4] and back pain management cost AU$3.36 billion in 2020. [4] The prevalence of LBP has been projected to increase over the next 25 years, with associated increases in disability with healthcare costs. [1] Most LBP is non-specific low back pain (NSLBP), referring to LBP that does not have a known pathoanatomical cause. [5] LBP is a complex condition that is multifactorial in nature, where a person’s pain experience is influenced by biological, psychological and social factors. [6] Recovery from an episode of LBP is also complex; approximately 25% of people with LBP experience recurrence within 12 months [7] and 44% of people can still experience pain at 12 months. [8]

There are more articles like this @

LOW BACK PAIN Section

(more…)

Proprioceptive Cervicogenic Dizziness: A Narrative Review of Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Treatment

By |December 22, 2024|Cervicogenic Dizziness, Chiropractic Management|

Proprioceptive Cervicogenic Dizziness: A Narrative Review of Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Treatment

The Chiro.Org Blog


SOURCE:   J Clinical Medicine 2022 (Oct 26); 11 (21): 6293
Yongchao Li • Liang Yang • Chen Dai • Baogan Peng

The Third Medical Centre of Chinese PLA General Hospital,
Department of Orthopedics,
69 Yongding Road,
Beijing 100039, China.



FROM:   J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2009


Basic science and clinical evidence suggest that cervical spine disorders can lead to dizziness. The cervical spine has highly developed proprioceptive receptors, whose input information is integrated with the visual and vestibular systems in the central nervous system, acting on the neck and eye muscleThere are many more studiess to maintain the coordinative motion of the head, eyes, neck, and body through various reflex activities.

When the cervical proprioceptive input changes due to the mismatch or conflict between vestibular, visual, and proprioceptive inputs, cervicogenic dizziness may occur. The diagnosis of cervicogenic dizziness can be determined based on clinical features, diagnostic tests, and the exclusion of other possible sources of dizziness. The cervical torsion test appears to be the best diagnostic method for cervicogenic dizziness.

Based on the available evidence, we first developed the diagnostic criteria for cervicogenic dizziness. Treatment for cervicogenic dizziness is similar to that for neck pain, and manual therapy is most widely recommended.

Keywords:   cervical proprioception; cervicogenic dizziness; diagnosis; management; neck pain; proprioceptors.


From the FULL TEXT Article:

Introduction

Dizziness is one of the most common reasons for consultation in adult patients. [1, 2] It is an umbrella term used to describe various sensations, including vertigo, disequilibrium, lightheadedness, or presyncope (Table 1). [2] From this perspective, vertigo is just one part of dizziness. However, in the light of the International Bárány Society for NeuroOtology [3], dizziness and vertigo are no longer subordinate but independent allelic symptoms. Dizziness and vertigo may coexist or occur sequentially (Table 2). [3] In 1955, Ryan and Cope [4] first described dizziness caused by neck disorders as cervical vertigo, also known as cervicogenic vertigo, cervicogenic dizziness or cervical dizziness. In this review, we use cervicogenic dizziness to name this trouble. A recent clinical observation of a large number of cases (1,000 cases) found that cervicogenic dizziness accounted for 89% of all dizziness, or vertigo. [5] Cervical spondylosis was one of the common causes of dizziness in the elderly in a community survey. [1] Among patients with cervical vertebral whiplash injuries, the prevalence of dizziness has been variously reported, ranging from 20% to 90%. [6] Nearly half of patients with neck pain have cervicogenic dizziness. [1] However, cervicogenic dizziness is the most controversial among all dizziness because its pathogenesis is unclear, and its diagnosis and treatment are difficult. [6-9]

Cervicogenic dizziness is considered to have four different pathogenesis, but proprioceptive cervicogenic dizziness is the most common and accepted by most scholars. [6] Unlike other forms of dizziness, cervicogenic dizziness is of interest not only to neurologists but also to physiotherapists, pain physicians, and orthopedic surgeons. The purpose of this narrative review is to highlight the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of cervicogenic dizziness from the perspective of the cervical proprioceptive afferent disorder.

There are more articles like this @

VERTIGO and/or BALANCE Section

(more…)

Conservative Management of Cervicogenic Dizziness Associated With Upper Cervical Instability and Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome: A Case Report

By |December 9, 2024|Cervicogenic Dizziness, Chiropractic Care, Evidence-based Practice|

Conservative Management of Cervicogenic Dizziness Associated With Upper Cervical Instability and Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome: A Case Report

The Chiro.Org Blog


SOURCE:   Cureus 2024 (Oct 31); 16 (10): e72765


Robert J Trager • Andres Schuster • Cliff Tao • Gina Zamary

Connor Whole Health,
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center,
Cleveland, USA.


  OPEN ACCESS   


Cervicogenic dizziness (CGD) is a disorder in which dizziness arises from cervical spine dysfunction and is diagnosed after excluding other conditions. We present a case of a 27–year-old woman with a six-year history of dizziness, neck and cervicothoracic pain, and occipital-temporal-orbital headaches. The patient also experienced occasional severe, incapacitating episodes of dizziness with vomiting. Previous evaluations, including advanced imaging, had helped rule out central, otolithic, and psychogenic causes of dizziness. Dynamic radiographs revealed signs of lateral instability of C1 while tilt table testing revealed postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS). Over eight months, the patient underwent a regimen of gentle manual therapies and cervical stability exercises. The patient’s dizziness substantially improved, as measured by the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), with scores reducing from 50 (moderate handicap) to 10 (less than mild handicap). This case highlights the importance of considering cervical spine dysfunction and associated conditions like POTS in the differential diagnosis of chronic dizziness. While conservative management including manual therapy appeared effective in this case for CGD with underlying upper cervical instability and POTS, additional research is needed on this topic.

Keywords:   case reports; cervical vertebrae; chiropractic; dizziness; headache; joint instability; neck pain; postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome; rehabilitation.


From the FULL TEXT Article:

Introduction

Dizziness is a non-specific term used to describe various sensations, including lightheadedness, unsteadiness, or a spinning feeling. Its utility as a diagnostic term is limited due to its broad nature, necessitating a thorough assessment of the patient’s history and examination for an accurate diagnosis. [1] Dizziness is typically evaluated based on its timing, associated triggers, and symptom subtypes. For instance, benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV), the most common cause of dizziness, accounting for approximately 24% of cases, presents with brief episodes of rotatory dizziness triggered by head movements. [1, 2] Other subtypes of dizziness may arise from vestibular, vascular, or psychogenic sources, with less frequent causes including Meniere’s disease, vestibular neuritis, and others. [2]

There are more articles like this @

VERTIGO and/or BALANCE Section

(more…)

Association Between Spinal Manipulation, Butalbital Prescription, and Medication Overuse Headache in Adults With Tension-Type Headache: Retrospective Cohort Study

By |December 8, 2024|Chiropractic Care, Headache|

Association Between Spinal Manipulation, Butalbital Prescription, and Medication Overuse Headache in Adults With Tension-Type Headache: Retrospective Cohort Study

The Chiro.Org Blog


SOURCE:   Health Science Reports 2024 (Nov 29); 7 (12): e70218


Robert J Trager • Timothy J Williamson • Pratheek S Makineni • Lindsay H Morris

Connor Whole Health University Hospitals
Cleveland Medical Center
Cleveland Ohio USA.



Background and aims:   Butalbital is an acute headache medication commonly prescribed for tension-type headache (TTH), although discouraged by guidelines due to a risk of medication overuse headache (MOH). Considering spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) may reduce TTH frequency and intensity, we hypothesized adults with TTH receiving chiropractic SMT would be less likely to receive a butalbital prescription over 2 years versus matched controls not receiving SMT. We secondarily compared likelihood of MOH between cohorts.

Methods:   We searched a United States medical records database of patients attending academic medical centers for adults with TTH, from 2013 to 2024, excluding those diagnosed with other headaches and seen in inpatient/emergency settings. We divided patients into two cohorts: (1) SMT and (2) non-SMT, using propensity matching to control for demographics and other variables associated with likelihood of butalbital prescription and MOH.

Results:   Three thousand one hundred and sixteen patients remained per cohort after matching. The incidence of butalbital prescription was lower in the SMT cohort compared to the non-SMT cohort (SMT: 1.7%; non-SMT: 3.8%), yielding an RR (95% CI) of 0.46 (0.33-0.63; p < 0.001). The incidence of MOH was lower in the SMT cohort versus non-SMT cohort (SMT: 0.5%; non-SMT: 1.2%), yielding an RR (95% CI) of 0.44 (0.25-0.80; p < 0.001).

Conclusion:   Adults receiving chiropractic SMT had a significantly lower likelihood of butalbital prescription and, tentatively, MOH compared to matched controls not receiving SMT. These findings support current guideline recommendations favoring SMT in TTH care, though future studies should replicate and compare these findings with other nonpharmacologic clinicians and interventions.

Keywords:   barbiturates; chiropractic; headache; spinal manipulation.


From the FULL TEXT Article:

Background

There is more like this @

HEADACHE Section and the

NON-PHARMACOLOGIC THERAPY Section and the

INITIAL PROVIDER/FIRST CONTACT Section

(more…)

Demonstration of Autonomic Nervous Function and Cervical Sensorimotor Control After Cervical Lordosis Rehabilitation: A Randomized Controlled Trial

By |November 25, 2024|Uncategorized|

Demonstration of Autonomic Nervous Function and Cervical Sensorimotor Control After Cervical Lordosis Rehabilitation: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The Chiro.Org Blog


SOURCE:   J Athl Train 2021 (Apr 1); 56 (4): 427–436

  OPEN ACCESS   

Ibrahim Moustafa • Ahmed S A Youssef • Amal Ahbouch • Deed Harrison

Department of Physiotherapy,
University of Sharjah,
United Arab Emirates.



Thanks to Charles Blum, DC, CSCP


Context:   Sagittal-plane cervical spine alignment has emerged as one of the most important clinical outcomes in health care. Nevertheless, the quantity and quality of research on the role that cervical sagittal alignment plays in improving sensorimotor and autonomic nervous functions are limited.

Objective:   To investigate the immediate and long-term effects of cervical lordosis restoration and correction of anterior head translation (AHT) on pain, disability, autonomic nervous system function, and cervical sensorimotor control in athletes with chronic nonspecific neck pain.

Design:   Randomized controlled clinical trial.

Setting:   University research laboratory.

Patients or other participants   : A total of 110 patients (59 males, 51 females) with chronic nonspecific neck pain and a defined hypolordotic cervical spine and AHT posture.

Intervention(s):   Patients were randomly assigned to the control or intervention group. Both groups received a multimodal program; the intervention group also received Denneroll cervical traction. Treatments were applied 3 times per week for 10 weeks.

Main outcome measure(s):   Outcome measures were cervical lordosis from C2 to C7, AHT, neck disability index, pain intensity, smooth-pursuit neck-torsion test, overall stability index, left- and right-rotation head repositioning accuracy, and amplitude and latency of skin sympathetic response. The measures were assessed 3 times: at baseline, after 10 weeks of treatment, and at 1-year follow-up.

Results:   The general linear model with repeated measures indicated group × time effects in favor of the intervention group for the following management outcomes: cervical lordosis, AHT, neck disability index, pain intensity, smooth-pursuit neck-torsion test, overall

Conclusions:   Restoration of cervical sagittal alignment in the athletic population had a direct influence on pain, disability, autonomic nervous system dysfunction, and sensorimotor control. Our results should guide treatment planning for athletes and optimize their recovery time.

There is more like this @ our

SPINAL ALLIGNMENT Section and the

FORWARD HEAD POSTURE Section

(more…)