Support Chiropractic Research!

Low Back Pain

Back and Pelvic Pain in an Underserved United States Pregnant Population

By |January 19, 2016|Low Back Pain, Pregnancy|

Back and Pelvic Pain in an Underserved United States Pregnant Population: A Preliminary Descriptive Survey

The Chiro.Org Blog


SOURCE:   J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2007 (Feb); 30 (2): 130–134


Clayton D. Skaggs, DC, Heidi Prather, DO,
Gilad Gross, MD, James W. George, DC,
Paul A. Thompson, PhD, D. Michael Nelson, MD, PhD

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,
Washington University School of Medicine,
St Louis, MO, USA.
skaggsdc@swbell.net


OBJECTIVE:   The objective of this study was to identify the prevalence of back pain and treatment satisfaction in a population of low-socioeconomic pregnant women.

METHODS:   This study used a cross-sectional design to determine the prevalence of self-reported musculoskeletal pain in pregnancy for 599 women. Women completed an author-generated musculoskeletal survey in the second trimester of their pregnancy that addressed pain history, duration, location, and intensity, as well as activities of daily living, treatment frequency, and satisfaction with treatment.

RESULTS:   Sixty-seven percent of the total population reported musculoskeletal pain, and nearly half presented with a multi-focal pattern of pain that involved 2 or more sites. Twenty-one percent reported severe pain intensity rated on a numerical rating scale. Eighty percent of women experiencing pain slept less than 4 hours per night and 75% of these women took pain medications. Importantly, 85% of the women surveyed perceived that they had not been offered treatment for their musculoskeletal disorders.

There are more articles like this @ our:

Chiropractic Pediatrics Page and the:

Low Back Pain and Chiropractic Page

(more…)

Overtreating Chronic Back Pain: Time to Back Off?

By |January 16, 2016|Evidence-based Medicine, Low Back Pain|

Overtreating Chronic Back Pain: Time to Back Off?

The Chiro.Org Blog


SOURCE:   J Am Board Fam Med. 2009 (Jan); 22 (1): 62–68


Richard A. Deyo, M.D., M.P.H., Sohail K. Mirza, M.D., M.P.H.,
Judith A. Turner, Ph.D., and Brook I. Martin, M.P.H.

Department of Medicine,
Oregon Health and Science University,
Portland, OR, USA.
deyor@ohsu.edu


Chronic back pain is among the most common patient complaints. Its prevalence and impact have spawned a rapidly expanding range of tests and treatments. Some of these have become widely used for indications that are not well validated, leading to uncertainty about efficacy and safety, increasing complication rates, and marketing abuses.

Recent studies document a

629% increase in Medicare expenditures for epidural steroid injections;

a 423% increase in expenditures for opioids for back pain;

a 307% increase in the number of lumbar magnetic resonance images among Medicare beneficiaries;

and a 220% increase in spinal fusion surgery rates.

The limited studies available suggest that these increases have not been accompanied by population-level improvements in patient outcomes or disability rates. We suggest a need for a better understanding of the basic science of pain mechanisms, more rigorous and independent trials of many treatments, a stronger regulatory stance toward approval and post-marketing surveillance of new drugs and devices for chronic pain, and a chronic disease model for managing chronic back pain.


 

From the FULL TEXT Article:

Introduction

There are more articles like this @ our:

Low Back Pain and Chiropractic Page

(more…)

Life-Threatening Lower Back Pain

By |January 8, 2016|Diagnosis, Low Back Pain|

Life-Threatening Lower Back Pain – Decoding the Mystery Step-By-Step

The Chiro.Org Blog


SOURCE:   A Chiro.Org Contribution


David J Schimp DC, DACNB, DAAPM, FICCN and
Stefanie Krupp DC, MS

David J Schimp DC
Schimp Office of Chiropractic Professionals LTD
937 E. Sumner St.
Hartford, WI 53027 USA


This article will help clinicians identify life-threatening conditions that present with lower back pain.


Intra-abdominal bleed (e.g. aortic aneurysm), infection and tumor are the most dangerous causes of lower back pain and carry the potential for devastating consequences.

Table 1 identifies red flags that should raise suspicion of a serious disorder. [1]

Other red flags that are less likely to be associated with a life-threatening condition but that still warrant prompt diagnosis and appropriate management include:

  • pain that is worse with coughing
  • incontinence of bowel or bladder
  • urinary retention (inability to void or empty the bladder completely)
  • impotence
  • saddle anesthesia
  • intractable radicular pain into the lower extremity
  • rapidly progressive neurological deficit

The latter findings are common among patients with lumbar nerve root compression or cauda equina syndrome. Although serious, these disorders are seldom life threatening.


Step 1 –   Evaluate for Red Flags*

Table 1:   Red Flags of Low Back Pain   [1]

RED FLAGS
BLEED
INFECTION
TUMOR
1.   Duration greater than 6 weeks
X
X
2.   Age less than 18y
X
X
3.   Age greater than 50y
X
X
X
4.   Prior history of cancer
X
5.   Fever, chills or night sweats
X
X
6.   Weight loss (unexplained)
X
X
7.   IV drug use
X
8.   Recent surgical procedure
X
9.   Night pain
X
X
10.   Unremitting, constant, no relief
X
X
X
11.   Concomitant abdominal pain
X
X
X
12.   Lightheaded, weak, diaphoretic, disorientated
X

*   This is a list of red flags that may be associated with a life-threatening disease.

It is not meant to include all the other red flags of lower back pain.


Step 1:   Evaluate for Red Flags   (Discussion)

  1. Duration greater than 6 weeks.   Intractable or progressive lower back pain lasting longer than 6 weeks should raise suspicion of a serious underlying condition. Radiographs (lumbar plain film series including coronal, sagittal and spot views) and routine laboratory studies will add a greater level of diagnostic accuracy to the evaluation. Basic laboratory studies to consider include comprehensive metabolic panel, complete blood count (CBC), C-reactive protein(CRP) or high sensitivity CRP (preferred), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and urinalysis (UA). [2]If imaging and lab studies are normal and the patient has normal vitals, then serious disease is unlikely. Advanced imaging (MRI or CT) can be utilized if plain film radiography if felt to lack sensitivity. In the absence of serious disease, a mechanical lesion, central sensitization or psychosocial co-morbidities may explain on-going pain over 6 weeks in duration.
  2. Age less than 18 years.   Persistent pain in a pediatric patient is a red flag for tumor or infection if symptoms cannot be ascribed to a congenital abnormality or acute injury. Advanced imaging (MRI) and routine laboratory studies as noted above should be considered. 
  3. Age greater than 50 years.   Although low back pain is common in this population, clinicians should be particularly alert to the patient that presents with a new onset of low back pain, whether or not a mechanical basis is identified. Intra-abdominal disorders (e.g. abdominal aortic aneurysm) and cancer are more common in this population. Although a mechanical lesion is more likely, older patients require a greater level of diligence to rule out serious disease.(see Table 1)
  4. Patient history of cancer.   Neoplasm involving the spine may present as unrelenting pain (i.e. does not improve with rest or analgesia) or pain that is worse at night. Cancer recurrence or metastasis to the spine should be considered when a patient with a prior history of cancer complains of unrelenting back pain. Advanced imaging (MRI) is valuable and early use may be appropriate if the index of suspicion is high. Basic laboratory testing can be helpful (e.g., elevation of alkaline phosphatase on a comprehensive metabolic panel and leukocytosis on a complete blood count). [2] A history of prior malignancy is the most informative of the all the red flags listed in Table 1 and may suggest active neoplasm as the cause of the individual’s back pain. (more…)

Prevalence of Pain-free Weeks in Chiropractic Subjects With Low Back Pain

By |December 6, 2015|Low Back Pain|

Prevalence of Pain-free Weeks in Chiropractic Subjects With Low Back Pain – A Longitudinal Study Using Data Gathered With Text Messages

The Chiro.Org Blog


SOURCE:   Chiropractic & Manual Therapies 2011 (Dec 14);   19:   28 ~ FULL TEXT


Nadège Lemeunier, Alice Kongsted, and Iben Axén

Institut Franco-Européen de Chiropratique,
Toulouse, France


INTRODUCTION:   The use of automated text messages has made it possible to identify different courses of low back pain (LBP), and it has been observed that pain often fluctuates and that absolute recovery is rather rare. The purpose of this study was to describe the prevalence of pain-free weeks and pain-free periods in subjects with non-specific LBP treated by chiropractors, and to compare subjects from two different countries in these aspects.

METHODS:   Data were obtained from two practice-based multicentre prospective outcome studies, one Danish and one Swedish, involving subjects being treated by chiropractors for non-specific LBP. Over 18 weeks, subjects answered a weekly automated text message question on the number of days in the past week that they had experienced bothersome LBP, i.e. a number between 0 and 7. The number of weeks in a row without any LBP at all (“zero weeks”) as well as the maximum number of zero weeks in a row was determined for each individual. Comparisons were made between the two study samples. Estimates are presented as percentages with 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS:   In the Danish and the Swedish populations respectively, 93/110 (85%) and 233/262 (89%) of the subjects were eligible for analysis. In both groups, zero weeks were rather rare and were most commonly (in 40% of the zero weeks) reported as a single isolated week. The prevalence of pain free periods, i.e. reporting a maximum of 0, 1 or 2, or 3-6 zero weeks in a row, were similar in the two populations (20-31%). Smaller percentages were reported for ≥ 7 zero weeks in a row. There were no significant differences between the two study groups.

There are more articles like this @ our:

Low Back Pain and Chiropractic Page

(more…)

Prediction of Pain Outcomes in a Randomized Controlled Trial of Dose-response of Spinal Manipulation for the Care of Chronic Low Back Pain

By |November 21, 2015|Chronic Pain, Low Back Pain|

Prediction of Pain Outcomes in a Randomized Controlled Trial of Dose-response of Spinal Manipulation for the Care of Chronic Low Back Pain

The Chiro.Org Blog


SOURCE:   BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 (Aug 19);   16:   205 ~ FULL TEXT


Darcy Vavrek, Mitchell Haas, Moni Blazej Neradilek, and Nayak Polissar

University of Western States,
2900 NE 132nd Ave,
Portland, OR, 97230, USA


BACKGROUND:   No previous studies have created and validated prediction models for outcomes in patients receiving spinal manipulation for care of chronic low back pain (cLBP). We therefore conducted a secondary analysis alongside a dose-response, randomized controlled trial of spinal manipulation.

METHODS:   We investigated dose, pain and disability, sociodemographics, general health, psychosocial measures, and objective exam findings as potential predictors of pain outcomes utilizing 400 participants from a randomized controlled trial. Participants received 18 sessions of treatment over 6-weeks and were followed for a year. Spinal manipulation was performed by a chiropractor at 0, 6, 12, or 18 visits (dose), with a light-massage control at all remaining visits. Pain intensity was evaluated with the modified von Korff pain scale (0-100). Predictor variables evaluated came from several domains: condition-specific pain and disability, sociodemographics, general health status, psychosocial, and objective physical measures. Three-quarters of cases (training-set) were used to develop 4 longitudinal models with forward selection to predict individual “responders” (≥50% improvement from baseline) and future pain intensity using either pretreatment characteristics or post-treatment variables collected shortly after completion of care. The internal validity of the predictor models were then evaluated on the remaining 25% of cases (test-set) using area under the receiver operating curve (AUC), R(2), and root mean squared error (RMSE).

RESULTS:   The pretreatment responder model performed no better than chance in identifying participants who became responders (AUC = 0.479). Similarly, the pretreatment pain intensity model predicted future pain intensity poorly with low proportion of variance explained (R(2) = .065). The post-treatment predictor models performed better with AUC = 0.665 for the responder model and R(2) = 0.261 for the future pain model. Post-treatment pain alone actually predicted future pain better than the full post-treatment predictor model (R(2) = 0.350). The prediction errors (RMSE) were large (19.4 and 17.5 for the pre- and post-treatment predictor models, respectively).

There are more articles like this @ our:

Low Back Pain and Chiropractic Page

(more…)

Where the United States Spends its Spine Dollars

By |November 5, 2015|Low Back Pain, Neck Pain|

Where the United States Spends its Spine Dollars: Expenditures on Different Ambulatory Services for the Management of Back and Neck Conditions

The Chiro.Org Blog


SOURCE:   Spine 2012 (Sep 1); 37 (19): 1693–1701 ~ FULL TEXT


Matthew A. Davis, DC, MPH

The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice,
Lebanon, NH 03766, USA.
matthew.a.davis@dartmouth.edu


STUDY DESIGN:   Serial, cross-sectional, nationally representative surveys of noninstitutionalized US adults.

OBJECTIVE:   To examine expenditures on common ambulatory health services for the management of back and neck conditions.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA:   Although it is well recognized that national costs associated with back and neck conditions have grown considerably in recent years, little is known about the costs of care for specific ambulatory health services that are used to manage this population.

METHODS:   We used the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey to examine adult (aged 18 yr or older) respondents from 1999 to 2008 who sought ambulatory health services for the management of back and neck conditions. We used complex survey design methods to make national estimates of mean inflation-adjusted annual expenditures on medical care, chiropractic care, and physical therapy per user for back and neck conditions.

RESULTS:   Approximately 6% of US adults reported an ambulatory visit for a primary diagnosis of a back or neck condition (13.6 million in 2008). Between 1999 and 2008, the mean inflation-adjusted annual expenditures on medical care for these patients increased by 95% (from $487 to $950); most of the increase was accounted for by increased costs for medical specialists, as opposed to primary care physicians. During the study period, the mean inflation-adjusted annual expenditures on chiropractic care were relatively stable; although physical therapy was the most costly service overall, in recent years those costs have contracted.

There are more articles like this @ our:

The Low Back Pain Page and the:

Chronic Neck Pain and Chiropractic Page

(more…)