Support Chiropractic Research!

Education

Chiropractic Training vs. Medical Training

By |August 4, 2009|Education, General|

Chiropractic Training vs. Medical Training

The Chiro.Org Blog


I was surprised to learn that, when I graduated from chiropractic school, that I would have taken 200 more class hours than a graduate of Johns Hopkins Medical School

This table is an eye opener because chiropractors receive more hours in diagnosis, orthopedics, microbiology, and more than twice as many hours in hours in neurology and radiology. WOW! (more…)

Chiropractic Reduces High Blood Pressure

By |July 29, 2009|Education, Journals, News|

Chiropractic Reduces High Blood Pressure

The Chiro.Org Blog


SOURCE:   Journal of Human Hypertension 2007 (May); 21 (5): 347–352


Bakris G, Dickholtz M, Meyer PM, Kravitz G, Avery E, Miller M, Brown J, Woodfield C, Bell B

Department of Preventive Medicine, Rush University Hypertension Center, Chicago, IL, USA


The Chiropractic and Blood Pressure Page reviews numerous studies that found that upper cervical adjusting reduces high blood pressure.

The study that received the most attention was done at Rush University in Chicago, and published in the Journal of Human Hypertension. This randomized trial assigned patients to either 2 blood pressure medicines, or to care from chiropractors who applied upper cervical specific adjusting. The results? Researchers found that restoration of Atlas alignment was associated with marked and sustained reductions in BP similar to the use of two-drug combination therapy. (more…)

Predicting Immediate Improvement With Cervical Spine Adjusting

By |July 28, 2009|Education, Outcome Assessment|

Patients with nonspecific musculoskeletal disorders may vary in their responses to treatment. For that reason, a recent, large prospective study in JMPT set out to identify the predictors for improvement or worsening of symptoms when cervical spine manipulation was indicated.

Data was collected from 28,807 treatment consultations (19,722 patients) and 13,873 follow-up treatments. The presenting symptoms of “neck pain”, “shoulder, arm pain”, “reduced neck, shoulder, arm movement, or stiffness”, “headache”, and “upper, mid back pain” all emerged in the final model as significant predictors for immediate improvement. The presence of any 4 of these predictors raised the probability of an immediate improvement in presenting symptoms after treatment from 70% to approximately 95%. (more…)